Grimshaw v. ford motor company summary
WebFeb 15, 2024 · Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company became one of the most famous car accident cases in 1978 when a jury returned a $125 million punitive damages award, the largest amount against an automaker at … Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company (119 Cal.App.3d 757, 174 Cal.Rptr. 348) was a personal injury tort case decided in Orange County, California in February 1978 and affirmed by a California appellate court in May 1981. The lawsuit involved the safety of the design of the Ford Pinto automobile, manufactured by the Ford Motor Company. The jury awarded plaintiffs $127.8 million in damages, the largest ever in US product liability and personal injury cases. Grimshaw v. Ford …
Grimshaw v. ford motor company summary
Did you know?
WebLegal Analysis Grimshaw V Ford Motor Company In 1972 a Ford Pinto, purchased six months prior, unexpectedly stalled on the freeway in California. The Pinto was hit from behind by a Ford Galaxy, erupting into flames instantly. The driver of the car, Lilly Gray, suffered from fatal burns and died a few days later in the hospital. WebJul 19, 1977 · In this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a single-vehicle accident, defendant Ford Motor Company (Ford) appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs Robert and …
WebAt Jenkins Ford in Buckhannon, we are devoted to making your vehicle shopping experience stress-free. An 11-time President's Award Winner, Jenkins Fords draw in … WebGrimshaw and Gray’s family filed a tort action against Ford, and the jury awarded not only $2.516 million to the Grimshaws and $559,680 to the Grays in damages for their injuries, but also $125 million to punish Ford …
WebGrimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. Case Name: Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. Procedural History: At trial court plaintiff won about $2 million compensatory damages and $125 … Web17. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company West's California Reporter. PART V: THE REGULATION OF BUSINESS. Introduction: The Regulation of Business. 18. Profits vs. Safety Francis T. Cullen, William J. Maakestad, and Gray Cavender. 19. Five Moral Imperatives of Government Regulation Peter Barton Hutt. 20. Regulation: A Substitute …
WebNov 12, 2024 · Grimshaw vs. Ford Motor Company: Ethical Analysis. Lily Grey who was aged about fifty two was on her just six-month old Ford Pinto in May, 1972. While …
WebBrief Fact Summary. The Plaintiff, MacPherson (Plaintiff), bought a car from a retail dealer, and was injured when a defective wheel collapsed. Plaintiff sued the Defendant, Buick Motor Co. (Defendant), the original manufacturer of the car, on an action for negligence. hdr emulated benqWebcontained in the notorious “Pinto Memo,” written by Ford engineers to guide design decisions. Incredibly, the analysis put a price tag on human life—$200,000— and then used that number to compare Ford’s projected cost of settling burn-victim’s lawsuits versus Ford’s cost of spending $11 per car to fix the fuel tank defect. hdr engineering seattleWebOperations Management questions and answers. Read the case excerpt of Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company, 119 Cal. App. 3d 757 (1981). Identify which approach to ethical decision-making you would have applied to this case if you were the judge. Explain why. Imagine that you create an App called WatchThis that allows users to share pictures and … hdr engineering of the carolinasWebMay 29, 1981 · Following a six-month jury trial, verdicts were returned in favor of plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company. Grimshaw was awarded $2,516,000 compensatory … hdr engineering historyWebIn the original verdict Richard Grimshaw was awarded $2,516,000 for compensatory damages and $125 million in punitive damages. The Gray’s were awarded $559,680 in … hdr engineering forsyth moWebFORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. No. 20095. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 2, California. May 29, 1981. SUMMARY An automobile manufactured by defendant unexpectedly stalled on a freeway and erupted into flames when it was rearended by a car proceeding in the same direction. hdr engineering raleigh ncWebNov 25, 2003 · In addition to its broad view of the goal of punitive damages, the Grimshaw court also adopted the broad view of the measure of punitive damages: "Unlike malicious conduct directed toward a single specific individual, Ford's tortious conduct endangered the lives of thousands of Pinto purchasers. golden statue new york courthouse