Pending a second round of external review
WebHealth Insurance Marketplace Home marketplace.cms.gov WebJan 22, 2016 · Manuscripts that go out for external review are subject to revise and resubmit requests at an editors’ discretion; CCJLS’s manuscript screening process helps …
Pending a second round of external review
Did you know?
WebMar 5, 2024 · As always, don’t forget to work in a warm, personalized line if possible—and remember to change the number of the round (e.g. “second round,” “third round”) in the first paragraph, as ... WebOn Dec 3rd we received a second round of review. Reviewer 2 continues to be positive; Reviewer 3 is replaced by Reviewer 4 (the editor says: "A second opinion was solicited at the request of one of the reviewers, which is included along with a review.Additional issues have been raised that should be addressed before your manuscript is reconsidered."
Webthe external review without completing the internal appeals process in the following cases: • Issuer waives internal appeal; • Urgent care situations (expedited external review may be initiated at the same time as expedited internal appeals); and • Failure to comply with all requirements of the internal appeals process WebNov 17, 2024 · 2. Since you (nor I) know how your paper's status is changed in the journal's website, you shouldn't jump to conclusions. It is likely that the change "under review" -> "decision pending" means that referee (s) report (s) were received, and now the editor has to make the decision. In many journals the decision does not fall solely on the editor ...
WebNov 21, 2024 · 2 The reviewers at first round of peer review process failed to return back at least 2 or 3 decisions, the editor therefore has to initial second round of peer review process (this usually takes ... Webrejected without going through the peer review process if the Editor decides that they are not suitable for the journal. The final decision on what to publish rests with the Editor of the journal. The journal editors are experts in their field and make unbiased, independent decisions. In maintaining high levels of quality through the peer review
WebIn the case of continuing the peer review process, the Editorial Office will organize the peer review, which is performed by independent experts, and collect at least two review reports per manuscript. We ask authors for sufficient revisions (with a second round of peer review, when necessary) before a final decision is made.
WebThe purpose of peer review is to evaluate the paper’s quality and suitability for publication. As well as peer review acting as a form of quality control for academic journals, it is a very … top ranked high schools near meWebDec 9, 2024 · 3a) your paper nonetheless has important results: then highlight that further research is necessary and your result is a move in the right direction. 3b) you cannot see a … top ranked heavyweight boxers 2021top ranked home insurance companiesWebMar 19, 2024 · However, it does reduce the independence of reviews. If that is important to you, the journal, or the field, you should probably avoid it and deal exclusively with the paper itself. So, the answer is, it depends. But if you have been sent those reviews by the editor, they may expect you to read them. top ranked high schoolshttp://cbcl.mit.edu/pnas/pnas-response.html top ranked high schools in illinoisWebPending Review is a temporary status that orders are placed in when they possess a variety of attributes that require them to be manually released by a specialized team. To help … top ranked high schools in njWebFeb 17, 2015 · For the second round of peer review, the paper is usually sent to the same set of reviewers. So the second round is generally quicker than the first round of peer … top ranked high school basketball